Warning: Missing argument 2 for wpdb::prepare(), called in /home3/cb457/public_html/wp-content/plugins/wp-post-thumbnail/wppt.php on line 372 and defined in /home3/cb457/public_html/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 1292
The Brain Maps Movement, Not Muscle | Boddicker Performance

Filed under: Neuroscience

The Brain Maps Movement, Not Muscle

by on Feb 3rd, 2011

Tags Share Comments (6)

You’ve heard it before. The brain doesn’t think about turning “on” individual muscles, but rather works in terms movements.

The brain, as was discussed at the Bridging The Gap with Charlie Weingroff, likewise does not speak in terms of “movement quality,” but rather cares only about movement success. The brain does not care how it gets from A to B only that it gets from A to B. This can be supported with what we know about motor maps in the premotor and motor areas.

Many are likely familiar with the Penfield maps that suggest that there are designated areas of the brain that represent specific areas of the body like the arm or foot for both sensation and motion. These maps are constantly changing and are sometimes variable between subjects. For example, in amputees, the brain area for the amputated limb is often overtaken by the adjacent body leading to unique sensory experiences like an itchy phantom hand that is alleviated by scratching the cheek.

The Penfield NeuroMap

Primate literature demonstrates that microstimulation of the motor and premotor areas result in complex functional synergies of muscle activation that ultimately bring the joint to a final posture provided that the duration of stimulation is adequte.

Traditionally, primate research was conducted using short (25-50ms) volleys of microstimulation, which resulted in muscle twitch, however, when Michael Graziano and colleagues at Princeton University used microstimulation for longer durations interesting things about our motor maps were revealed.

A primate stimulated in a particular area for 1000ms resulted in the hand forming an opposition posture, the forearm supinating, elbow flexion, shoulder rotation, and opening of the mouth. The final stimualted posture was that akin to the primate feeding himeself. This complex muscular synergy was also identified by Holdefer and Miller. The authors determined that brain motor areas do not represent a specific direction or velocity, but rather the final posture.

Jaw movement, too, appears to be mapped as movement and not as activation of specific muscles that open and close it. A brain area responsible for the mouth and jaw, when stimulated, would result in a cycle of chewing. If the mouth was biased in the opened position, stimulation would beget a closing of the mouth and vice versa is true.

Providing credence to the neurology of movement variability and the brain’s ability to read only success, when joints were preset in different areas, the final posture was consistently repeated and offered different variability regardless of the route necessary to take it there. Final postures were reached even in the face of various impediments to movement.

It stands to reason that the human motor areas respond in a similar manner. Regardless of whether or not you can move in a particular way or via a specific joint movement during a particular exercise does not necessarily mean that it’s good. It simply means that the brain will access plan B by stimulating a slightly different motor area to achieve the same or similar final posture.

With repeated activation, plan B simply becomes plan A due to impediment, and becomes “normal” and functionally dominant. Changes in the brain’s maps are implicated across a range of function and dysfunction. As is the case, remember, our number one target organ for all intervention is the brain.

Move well, be well,

Carson Boddicker

Related Articles
Leave a Comment »6 Comments
  • Nick Efthimiou February 3, 2011

    “Our number one target organ for all intervention is the brain” – I’ve been thinking along this line for a while now, but that sums it up nicely.

    Whenever you treat something manually, whatever you are doing is aimed to impact the nervous system.

  • Carson Boddicker February 3, 2011

    Nick,

    Thanks for the comments. I wish I could take credit for that brilliance, but that’s one I luckily was able to steal from the eloquent Charlie Weingroff.

    It is nearly impossible to do anything independently of the nervous system, which makes it a profoundly powerful ally in doing what we do if we can coax it the right way.

    Regards,
    Carson Boddicker

  • Mike Boykin February 14, 2011

    Carson,

    Do you happen to have the research articles you used for this post? Other than the work Graziano has done at Princeton? Much appreciated.

    Mike

  • Carson Boddicker February 14, 2011

    Yes, Mike. There is only one other. Send me an e-mail.

    Regards,
    Carson Boddicker

Get a GravatarLeave a Reply

Name: « Required

Email Address: « Required

Website URL: « Optional

*

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Boddicker Performance Newsletter

Sign up for the Boddicker Performance Newsletter and get "Secrets of the Psoas" free!